2 results
No, it wouldn't. Note the following factors: 1. The term "unknown" is not in the original text. The King James translators added it. It is unwarranted and unnecessary. 2. In 1 Corinthians 14, the nature of the "tongues" must match those defined earlier in the New Testament (i.e., human languages;...
Some denominational preachers claim, "There's not a drop of water in Romans 10:9-10. It's as dry as a desert wasteland." Not only does the statement betray a myopic view that contradicts many plain New Testament passages, but it also reveals ignorance of, or bias against, sound biblical interpret...