128 results
Ezekiel 28:1–19 is a fascinating study of the prophetic promise of the fall of ancient Tyre. Unfortunately, this segment of Scripture has become the seedbed of two ideas that have no merit in the sacred text—namely, the fall of Satan in Eden and the rise of the Antichrist near the end of the curr...
A closer look at one of Jesus’ parables intensifies the point intended by our Lord.
Does 1 Corinthians 14:26ff authorize solos or choirs in New Testament worship?
Psalm 26 is a thrilling example of a sincere man, most likely king David, who, in spite of personal weaknesses, was generally a man of integrity. He begs the Lord to examine his heart and bless him.
Premillenialists, desperately clinging to the notion that the “land promise” to the Israelites is yet unfulfilled, disregard clear Bible testimony.
In Genesis 15, Jehovah made a promise to Abraham. He declared that the patriarch’s seed would someday possess the territory between “the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates” (v. 18). Has the promise been fulfilled?
This is a review of Professor Michael Dyson’s new book, The True Martin Luther King.
Saul, Israel’s first king, stands as a solemn warning to all who followed thereafter.
The Old Testament identifies the father of Samuel the prophet as both a Levite and an Ephraimite. How can this be? Did the Old Testament writers make a mistake? Not hardly. Below is one possible explanation for the seeming conflict.
The first verse of the Gospel of John is absolutely brimming with meaning, and it refutes a host of popular errors.
When 1 Peter 1:1, 2 is seen in concert with related biblical material, the doctrine of election is removed from the confusing fog of sectarian dogma.
Christ is our attorney, pleading our case before the Father. What a thrilling concept!
What is the meaning of Balaam’s prophecy that begins: “I see him, but not now”?
It appears that 2 Kings 8:26 and 2 Chronicles 22:2 conflict with reference to the age of Ahaziah. Is there a reasonable explanation for this discrepancy?
Some point to Genesis 1:1-2 as a biblical basis for the Gap Theory. Yet a brief study of the grammar of this passage shows there is no such basis.
It is a serious mistake to make the prophetic time frame of the book of Revelation hinge one solitary expression.
Did the apostle Paul teach that baptism was not necessary for salvation from sins? By no means. Study this passage with us.
A comparison of 1 Peter 1:22 and Acts 2:38 amplifies the meaning of “obedience to the truth.”
Some contend this passage indicates that miracles are a present-day reality. Wayne Jackson explains why this cannot be true.
Does the Bible sanction a speaking in “tongues” that involves the utterance of “ecstatic” sounds that are understood only by the speaker and God? Sincere Pentecostal folks answer in the affirmative. They contend that these indiscernible sounds are the “tongues of angels” (1 Cor. 13:1). This artic...