False Ideas About Jesus Christ

Jesus Christ is the most renowned person of human history? That being true, why are there so many false ideas circulating about him? Because people have biases and they “reinvent” a “Jesus” after their own presuppositions. In this article we review some of the bizarre theories.
By Wayne Jackson | Christian Courier

No narration available

Without question Jesus of Nazareth is the most dominating figure in human history. Who was he? Or in the words of the Teacher himself in a question to the leaders of the Jewish community, “What do you think of the Christ?” Every intellectually reflective person must come to grips with this engaging question.

The available data regarding the identity of Jesus are definitive. He is the Christ, the Son of God (John 20:30-31). Regrettably, however, there are numerous erroneous opinions regarding him in the marketplace of religious ideas.

Jesus Never Existed

As strange as it may sound, some, in their desperation to dismiss the Lord, deny that he ever lived upon this earth. This notion was advanced by a German historian named Bruno Baur, near the middle of the 19th century. In our own time, The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (Moscow, 1952), in a two-line entry under “Jesus,” states; “the name of the mythological founder of Christianity.” One scholar notes that this reveals more about the authors’ bias than their historical judgment (Metzger, 1965, 78).

An apostate Pentecostal, turned-skeptic, has affirmed that he is “convinced that the story of Jesus is just a myth” (Barker, 1992, 359-360). What a woefully ignorant viewpoint. It dismisses the following lines of evidence.

  1. There are thousands of copies of the Greek New Testament Scriptures (in part or in whole), some of which stand in the shadows of the apostles themselves, that testify to the existence of Jesus Christ.
  2. The Jewish historian Josephus twice mentions Christ (Antiquities 18.3.3; 20.9.1). The Babylonian Talmud refers to Jesus’trial by the Sanhedrin, and to his execution on the eve of the Passover. The prominent Jewish scholar of Hebrew University, Joseph Klausner, in his famous book, Jesus of Nazareth, had an extensive section demonstrating the Hebrew evidence for Christ’s existence (1989, 17-54). He did not dispute the matter at all.
  3. There are several Roman sources documenting the historicity of Jesus. Pliny, governor of Bithynia, wrote a letter to the Roman emperor Trajan (c. A.D. 112) in which he referred to the fact that Christians gather on a certain day to worship Christ as if he were a god (Epistle X.96). The historian Tacitus, in his Annals (c. A.D. 115), comments regarding one “Christus” who was condemned to death by Pontius Pilate (XV.44). Finally, Seutonius (c. A.D. 120), secretary to the emperor Hadrian (hence one having access to official records), mentions the expulsion of certain Jews from Rome due to the controversy surrounding “Chrestus” (Vita Claudii XXV.4) — an incident which agrees with Luke’s reference in Acts 18:2.

Though he did not accept Jesus as the Son of God, Klausner exposes the arguments of those who deny that these are references to Jesus of Nazareth; he argues there is historical proof for the existence of Christ and his extensive influence in the early years of Christian history (1989, 60-62).

A Spirit Being, Not Flesh

Out of the ancient world of the New Testament period there eventually evolved a movement known as Gnosticism. This term covered a variety of sects that advocated numerous aberrant ideas at variance with biblical truth. Many scholars are convinced that there are a number of New Testament warnings concerning the developing errors of this heresy (cf. 1 Timothy 6:20).

One branch of this philosophy was known as “Docetism” — from the Greek term dokein, which means “to seem.” These heretics believed that Jesus was not a real, flesh-and-blood man; he merely “appeared” to be. This notion strikes at the very heart of the gospel. By implication, it denies such matters as: the incarnation (John 1:14), the Savior’s resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:1-4), and the high priesthood of the Son of God (Hebrews 2:17-18). Thankfully, this false ideology is no longer seriously entertained by any significant movement.

Christ, The First-Created Being

Those affiliated with the Watchtower Society allege that the second Person of the Godhead, Jesus Christ, was not an eternal being. Instead, it is claimed, he was “the first of God’s creations ... he had a beginning” (Reasoning from the Scriptures, 1985, 409).

There is no basis for this fanatical theory, as the following facts reveal.

  • A number of passages assert the eternality of the Word who became flesh (John 1:14). Isaiah denominates him as “everlasting” (9:6), and Micah declares that his goings forth have been “from everlasting” (5:2).
  • When John affirms: “In the beginning was the Word” (1:1), he employs an imperfect tense form, which suggests “continuous timeless existence” (Bernard, 1928, 2).
  • Christ is designated as “the Alpha and the Omega” (Revelation 21:6; 22:13), which expression is applied to God earlier in the same document (1:8). The phrase constitutes a “strong assertion of the true and eternal deity of Jesus Christ” (Vos, 1975, 111).

But the “Jehovah’s Witnesses” argue that since Jesus is called “the firstborn of all creation” (Colossians 1:15), and “the beginning of the creation” (Revelation 3:14), he must have had an origin in time, hence, was not eternal. The arguments are invalid.

First, the term “beginning” (arche) in this text is a reference to Christ as the “first cause” of creation (Danker, 2000, 138; Thayer, 1958, 77). As Robertson noted: “not the first of creatures ... but the originating source of creation” (1933, 321). In Revelation 22:13, Jesus is designated as “the beginning” and “the end.” If “beginning” means that he had a commencement, does “end” suggest that he will be terminated ultimately?

Second, the term “Firstborn” does not imply an origin for the Savior. “Firstborn” is used frequently in the sense of “rank,” i.e., the “chief” (Liddell & Scott, 1869, 1400). Adam Clarke has shown that the Hebrews even referred to Jehovah, the Father, as “the firstborn of all the world” to signify the fact that he produced all things (n.d., 516). Not even the Watchtower folks contend that the Father had an origin. Long after Christ was in existence (as conceded even by the Watchtower Witnesses), a prophet announced: “I [the Father] also will make [future tense] him [Christ] my first-born” (Psalm 89:27). Obviously the term denotes rank, rather than chronological commencement.

Christ Was An Angel

Another false theory of the self-styled “Jehovah’s Witnesses” is the claim that Jesus is to be identified with Michael, the arch-angel (Reasoning, 1985, 218). Considerable New Testament evidence demonstrates that Christ was not an angel. Note this irresistible logic.

First, angels refuse worship (Revelation 22:8, 9). But Jesus accepted worship (Matthew 8:2; 9:18; 14:33). Jesus, thus, was not an angel. The worship of angels is sinful (Colossians 2:18). If Christ was a mere angel, he should have rebuked those who worshiped him (Matthew 14:33), yet he never did!

Second, the entire first chapter of Hebrews is an argument proving that Jesuswas not of the angel class. For instance, God never said to an angel: “[Y]ou are my son, this day have I begotten you” (1:5); and yet, he did make that statement of Christ. Clearly, Christ was not an angel. Too, all the angels were to worship Jesus (1:6). But one worships a superior, not an equal. Obviously, therefore, Christ was not of the angel class. For a more elaborate discussion of these erroneous ideas, as entertained by the Watchtower advocates, see the author’s booklet, Jehovah’s Witnesses And The Doctrine Of The Deity Of Christ (1979).

Same Person As The Father

Those who are affiliated with the United Pentecostal Church contend that “Jesus” is merely the earthly name of God, the Father. They allege there is but one person who is God, but that “God” is represented in three manifestations — Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Scripture, however, reveals a clear distinction between the Father and the Son, and between the Son and the Holy Spirit.

The Jews had never seen the father nor heard his voice (John 1:18; 5:37), but they had both seen and heard Christ. Hence, Christ was not the same as the Father. The person who abides in the Lord’s doctrine has both the Father and the Son (2 John 9) — both implies a plurality. One could sin against Christ and be forgiven, but not the Spirit (Matthew 12:32). Therefore, Christ and the Spirit were not the same person. This topic is discussed more fully in the author’s tract, The Biblical Doctrine Of The Godhead (1994).

Jesus, A Messianic Manipulator

Though it is a rare and clearly incredible viewpoint, there are those who contend that Jesus was a first-century huckster who manipulated people into believing he was the Messiah. Hugh J. Schonfield, in his infamous volume The Passover Plot, argued this very point. He asserted that Christ “plotted and schemed with utmost skill” to feign his death and resurrection (1965, 155).

Schonfield contended that Jesus labored under the illusion that he was the Messiah and so contrived to bring the “greatest conspiracy in the history of mankind” to fruition. He alleged that Christ actually did not die upon the cross at all; rather, he merely received a powerful narcotic that made him appear as dead. Then, by a prearranged plan, he was removed unconscious from the cross by his disciples. Unfortunately, Schonfield supposed, Jesus did not anticipate that a Roman soldier would plunge a spear into his side: and so, after being taken from the cross on Saturday, “he regained consciousness temporarily, but finally succumbed” (1965, 165).

Is there any evidential basis at all for this bizarre theory? Not a shred. It is inconceivable that hardened and experienced Roman soldiers would have allowed the Lord’s disciples to remove his body without carefully examining it to determine whether the victim was really dead. Schonfield’s contention does not pass the commonsense test.

Then there is this curious fact. In 1959, just six years before The Passover Plot was published, Schonfield wrote a book titled, The Bible Was Right. In that production, the author contended that Jesus collapsed and “expired” after six hours on the cross. He stated that the soldiers broke the legs of the two thieves crucified on either side of the Lord, but that this was not done in the case of Christ because “he was found to be dead already” (1959, 74). Now here is an intriguing question. What great historical discovery was brought to light between 1959 and 1965, that led Schonfield to reverse his view of the Lord’s death, and to argue the “Passover plot” theory? None at all. It is perfectly clear that the real “plot” was Hugh J. Schonfield’s — and that was powered by monetary motives.

A Good Man — Nothing More

A very common view regarding Christ is that he was merely a good man, perhaps a wise philosopher, but certainly not the Son of God. Modernists claim Jesus differed from ordinary men in degree, but not in kind.

For example, the late Steve Allen, the entertainer, wrote two vicious diatribes against the Bible. Though he utterlyrepudiated the proposition that Jesus of Nazareth was a divine being, he nonetheless had high praise for the Lord. “[A]mong human heroes, Jesus is supreme. For he not only preached but apparently demonstrated the virtues of compassion, charity, love, courage, faith, and intelligence.” Allen said Christ “approaches the ideal of perfection more closely than anyone else who has ever lived” (1990, 229). But this position is absolutely illogical, and for the following reasons.

  1. No one knows anything at all about the nature of Christ except what he learns from the New Testament. As previously indicated, though one can establish the historical existence of Jesus from secular sources, there is no antique literary document, aside from the biblical record, regarding Christ’s personal character. One is thus dependent upon New Testament information — if he says anything at all concerning Jesus.
  2. But there is ample scriptural evidence that Christ claimed that he was more than a mere good person. He argued that he came from heaven (John 6:48-51), that he was the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matthew 16:16-17), who shared the same nature as the Father (John 10:30).
  3. If the Lord was not the Son of God, then he lied about that matter. He lied consistently and continuously. He deceived multitudes. He led many to sacrifice their very lives for the belief that he is divine. How, in the name of common sense, can one argue that anyone who acted in such a fashion was a “good man”?

One Prophet Among Many

Some accept Christ as a prophet of God (Acts 3:22), but contend that he was merely one figure in a long line of divine spokesmen. According to them, he was not the greatest one, and most certainly not the last. For example, the religion of Islam speaks very highly of Jesus as a prophet, but alleges that Christ disclaimed being deity (his followers deified him), and that he never died upon the cross (Anderson, 1950, 62-63). To those of the Islamic persuasion, Mohammed was the last and greatest of the prophets.

Similarly, there is the Baha’i movement, founded by Mirza ‘Mohammed in Iran (c. 1844). This apostate form of Islam proclaimed the coming a great World Teacher. In 1863 Mirza Husayn ’ Ali announced that he was that Teacher. He adopted the name Baha’u’llah (from which Baha’i is derived). Baha’i teaching asserts there has been a series of prophets, beginning with Adam. Adam’s successors were Moses, Krishna, Buddha, Zarathushtra, Christ, Mohammed, and finally Baha’i — the most important of all. But the fact is, Christ was not just one figure in a series of prophets. He is the way, the truth, and the life (John 14:6), and apart from him there is no salvation (Acts 4:12).

The Strictly Benevolent Christ

There are those who sincerely believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, but they have a warped view of his nature. They entertain the notion that Jesus was a loving, compassionate character, who went about doing good, and who would never be able to bring himself to punish human beings eternally (see Smith, 2003, 165ff). These folks simply cannot fathom the fact that there is a wrathful side to Jesus.

Such a concept is purely subjective and totally at variance with New Testament data. The Lord spoke clearly of the lost who are in danger of judgment and hell (Matthew 5:22). To those who attempt to plead their case after it is too late, Christ will declare: “I never knew you: depart from me” (Matthew 7:23; cf. 25:12). Jesus taught that the wicked, both body and soul, will be destroyed in hell (Matthew 10:28).

The Lord described his role as the king who judges (Matthew 25:31-46). Indeed, the wicked will not be able to stand in the day of the Lamb’s wrath (Revelation 6:16,17; cf. 14:10). While one must never in any way minimize the tender, loving nature of the Son of God, it is a gross perversion of Bible doctrine to deny that he will judge his enemies (Luke 19:14, 27).


Jesus himself taught that a correct belief concerning his identity is crucial. “[E]xcept you believe that I am he, you shall die in your sins” (John 8:24). One cannot repudiate the existence of Christ, pervert the truth regarding his nature, and reject the exclusiveness of his mission without suffering an eternal consequence for such folly.

  • Allen, Steve. Steve Allen On The Bible, Religion, & Morality. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus. 1990.
  • Anderson, J.N.D., Editor (1950), The World’s Religions._ Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co. 1950.
  • Danker, F. W. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago. 2000.
  • Barker, Dan. Losing Faith in Faith. Madison, WI: Freedom From Religion Foundation. 1992.
  • Bernard, J. H. The Gospel According to John. Edinburgh, Scotland: T. & T. Clark. 1928.
  • Clarke, Adam Clarke’s Commentary New York, NY: Abingdon Press), VI. n.d.
  • Jackson, Wayne. Jehovah’s Witnesses And The Doctrine Of The Deity Of Christ. Pasadena, TX: Haun. 1979.
  • Jackson,Wayne. The Biblical Doctrine of the Godhead. Montgomery, AL: Apologetics Press. 1994.
  • Klausner, Joseph (1989), Jesus of Nazareth. New York, NY: Bloch Publishing Co. 1989.
  • Liddell, H. G. & Scott, Robert. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. 1869.
  • Metzger, Bruce. The New Testament—Its Background, Growth, and Content. New York, NY: Abingdon Press. 1965.
  • Reasoning from the Scriptures. Brooklyn, NY: Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, 1985.
  • Robertson, A. T. Word Pictures in the New Testament. Nashville: Broadman. VI. 1933.
  • Schonfield, Hugh J. The Bible Was Right. New York: Signet Key Books. 1959.
  • Schonfield, Hugh J. The Passover Plot. New York, NY: Bantam Books. 1965.
  • Smith, F. LaGard. After-Life – A Glimpse of Eternity Beyond Death’s Door. Nashville, TN: Cotswold. 2003.
  • Thayer, J.H. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament Edinburgh, Scotland: T. & T. Clark. 1958.
  • Vos, J. G. Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, Merrill Tenney, Ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan. Vol. 1. 1975.