In Acts 2:38 Peter contended that baptism is “for” (eis) the remission of sins. Since many religionists deny this biblical truth, they seek comfort in a supposed parallel that they imagine nullifies the force of eis in Acts 2:38. Some imagine they have found a solution to their theological problem in Matthew 12:41. But have they?

“He who is without sin, let him cast the first stone.” If there is one verse most folks have memorized, it is this one. But what does it really mean?

Do public school officials have the right to force students to read materials that they or their parents deem to be morally offensive?

What does Jesus expect from his disciples?

When the conditions God are happily met, one may be assured of the merciful pardon of Heaven.

What was the nature of the product of Jesus’ first miracle at Cana?

A subtle, but important, point from the Greek text helps us to distinguish several factors in the plan of salvation

Does the New Testament authorize the observance of each-Sunday communion? Is communion restricted to Sunday?

If the thief on the cross could be saved without being baptized, why cannot people today do the same?

A remarkable passage in John demonstrates that a human response is required in God’s plan of salvation.

Christ is our attorney, pleading our case before the Father. What a thrilling concept!

Although baptism is mentioned dozens of times in the New Testament, the rite has been so grossly misunderstood in a great variety of ways.

One of the great scenes of Old Testament history is the exodus of Israel from Egyptian bondage. In this article, we wish to consider four aspects of this epochal event — the date of the exodus, the visitation of plagues upon Egypt, the passover, and the passage through the Red Sea.

In recent years much publicity has been given to certain “Bible codes” that are reputed to predict future events. Some even claim that these codes are evidence for the divine origin of the Scriptures. What are the facts? Wayne Jackson addresses this in this month’s Feature article.

Valid faith is never passive. It becomes a redemptive quality only when it responds in implementing the will of Jehovah.

The first verse of the Gospel of John is absolutely brimming with meaning, and it refutes a host of popular errors.

A “Jehovah’s Witness” is upset at some of our articles that affirm the divine nature of Jesus Christ. He claims that John 17:3 negates the idea that Jesus is “God” in nature. This article responds to the gentleman’s charge.

The Holy Spirit was promised by Christ to his apostles for their special work.

Why is there so much religious diversity in the world—or even in the community of “Christendom”? Surely such is not the ideal will of God. Let us consider this theme most carefully.

Jesus declared that “worship” must be consistent with revealed “truth” (John 4:24), namely God’s word (John 17:17). This includes the musical engagement of the church.